I’ve read this
before. It should be short, simple, and
predominately a memory-jogger. These thoughts
of mine before starting the novel were unfortunately mistaken. I was a fan of Huck Finn when I first read it
in elementary school, but soon after I began reading this edition last week I
realized that what I had read back then had been an abridged, easy-to-read,
Disney-ified version of the surprisingly blatant portrayal of a young man’s
journey down the Mississippi.
One thing that interested
me about Huck was his inability to tell the truth. He seems to be a pathological liar, and quite
a good one, able to create elaborate aliases and convince average strangers to
believe them. His ability to lie gets
him out of trouble several times, like when he convinced some men searching for
slaves that his family had smallpox so they would stay away or when he is able
to explain his Sarah Mary Williams mishap away without revealing his true
self. Huck’s preference for deception
corresponds to his general disconnect from society’s traditional views of right
and wrong. Society conventionally
disapproves of dishonesty, but Huck doesn’t seem to feel even slightly guilty
for his perpetual deceit.
Since Huck is so
detached from society, his enlightening expedition down the Mississippi seems
similar to Candide’s bystander-like journey through his society. Huck’s reactions to the illogical conventions
of society function as Twain’s criticisms, similarly to Voltaire’s use of
Candide’s experience to criticize 18th century France. One topic under Huck’s scrutiny is the seemingly
silly acts required by society. He
disregarded sleeping in beds and bathing regularly, and didn’t understand at
all the value society has placed upon religion.
He seemed to base his opinions on the concrete, on tangible gains and
losses, but it’s interesting to compare how his expectations line up with what
he observes. For example, when Huck did
something he expected was unlucky, like spilling salt, he quickly saw the
parallel between that and an unfavorable event that happened soon after.
Although it wasn’t the same simple tale that
I remember from my childhood, I still found Huck’s adventure to be eye-opening and an intriguing glimpse into a strange society.
Hi Sydney, Thanks for the good response to -HF-. Re-reading the book always brings out different issues and different responses. I have read the book multiple times, and I still read it differently each time. Huck is a good liar, but only when there is a good cause to lie, like saving Jim. But when he is forced to lie for the King and the Duke, he's a terrible liar. This points to something deep within his heart. dw
ReplyDelete